In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the interest of Mongolian historians in developing problems of their country's historiography based on the revision of previous, traditional approaches, largely borrowed from Soviet historiography. In this regard, the monographs of well-known contemporary Mongolian historians J. Boldbaatar "Mongolian Historiography: Renewal and Trends (1990s - present)" [Boldbaatar, 2008], N. Altantsetseg "Studies and concepts of Great Powers in relation to Mongolia (Russia, USA, China)" [Altantsetseg, 2008B. Punsaldulam and N. Hishigt "Revolutions of 1911 and 1921 in Mongolia (Review of foreign historiography)" [Punsaldulam and Hishigt, 2008], collective monograph " Historiography of the Khalkhingol War "[Khalkhyn golyn dainy tuukh bichleg, 2009] , etc. In modern Mongolia, there is not a single military or civilian historian who studies the history of his country and its place in international relations in the XX century, who would to one degree or another not study the problems associated with the events on Khalkhin Gol, Mongolia's participation in World War II, and the international recognition of the MNR as an independent, independent state. The results of these long-term studies are reflected in dozens of books, individual and collective monographs, collections of documents, hundreds of articles, reports at international and national conferences and symposia, memoirs of event participants, reference books, illustrated albums, etc. According to rough estimates of Mongolian historians, over the past 70 years only about the Khalkhingol War in Mongolia, Russia, Japan, China, the United States and other countries, more than 450 major works, monographs, collections of articles, documents, memoirs of war participants have been published, including about 260 in the Mongolian language, and more than 130 in Russian, There are about 100 books in Japanese and Chinese, and more than 20 in English [Khalkhyn golyn dainy tuukh bichleg, 2 ... Read more