Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice to meet you" to someone you'd like to poison. Politeness here is not just etiquette, but a weapon, a shield, and a diplomatic passport. Whether a diplomat pronounces "we are concerned" depends on whether war will break out or not. In this world, a smile can mean a threat, and a handshake can mean sanctions. We analyze how politeness works in diplomacy, using examples of real protocols and scandals.Diplomatic Protocol: Rituals Behind the HypePoliteness in diplomacy is strictly regulated. There is the Vienna Convention of 1961, there are national protocols: how to greet, who should extend a hand first, the order of seating guests. A breach can be considered an insult. For example, inviting an ambassador to a reception later than other heads of diplomatic missions is a demonstrative lowering of status. These rituals are a framework that allows enemies to sit at the same table. But behind the formal politeness often lies nothing but cold calculation.Politeness as an Euphemism for ThreatsIn diplomatic language, it is customary to soften formulations. Instead of "we declare war," it's "we are taking retaliatory measures." Instead of "you are lying," it's "allow us to doubt the accuracy of the provided data." Instead of "stop the bombings," it's "we express deep concern about the humanitarian situation." Diplomatic politeness allows to save face, even when the parties are on the brink of conflict. But for those who know how to read between the lines, such politeness is transparent. "We hope for a constructive dialogue" often means "surrender." Typical Diplomatic Clichés and Their Deciphering"We strongly condemn" — we are angry, but we can do nothing. "We express concern" — we don't care, but we have to say something. "We call on the parties to show restraint" — we don't want to fight for you. "We note positive developments" — progress is minimal, but we have to report. "The exchange of views has taken place in a constructive spirit" — w ... Read more